FA CupHenan Jianye 11 Dalian ZhixingFTFA CupYunnan Yukun 33 Chengdu Better CityFTFA CupShanghai Shenhua 41 Qingdao JonoonFTFA CupChongqing Tongliang Long 20 Qingdao Youth IslandFTFA CupWuhan Three Towns 22 Shandong LunengFTFA CupSHANGHAI SIPG 11 Sichuan JiuniuFTFriendlies ClubsStevenage 04 West HamFTFriendlies ClubsMaidenhead 01 WolvesFTFriendlies ClubsNapoli 13 ArezzoFTFriendlies ClubsTottenham 10 Milton Keynes DonsFTFriendlies ClubsNottingham Forest 30 BlackburnFTFriendlies ClubsWalsall 05 Aston VillaFTFA CupDalian Kewei 12 Beijing GuoanFTLIVEReserve LeagueCentral Córdoba SdE Res. 00 Platense Res.90+4'FA CupHenan Jianye 11 Dalian ZhixingFTFA CupYunnan Yukun 33 Chengdu Better CityFTFA CupShanghai Shenhua 41 Qingdao JonoonFTFA CupChongqing Tongliang Long 20 Qingdao Youth IslandFTFA CupWuhan Three Towns 22 Shandong LunengFTFA CupSHANGHAI SIPG 11 Sichuan JiuniuFTFriendlies ClubsStevenage 04 West HamFTFriendlies ClubsMaidenhead 01 WolvesFTFriendlies ClubsNapoli 13 ArezzoFTFriendlies ClubsTottenham 10 Milton Keynes DonsFTFriendlies ClubsNottingham Forest 30 BlackburnFTFriendlies ClubsWalsall 05 Aston VillaFTFA CupDalian Kewei 12 Beijing GuoanFTLIVEReserve LeagueCentral Córdoba SdE Res. 00 Platense Res.90+4'
Back to news
formula1

Why Hamilton was penalised at Spa while Leclerc escaped sanction

Belgian Grand Prix stewards treated two wheel-to-wheel incidents differently because they judged George Russell had earned racing room against Lewis Hamilton, while Oscar Piastri had not reached the same threshold against Charles Leclerc.

Why Hamilton was penalised at Spa while Leclerc escaped sanction
Image credit: bbc.co.uk

Lewis Hamilton was penalised because stewards ruled George Russell was sufficiently alongside him and entitled to space before their opening-lap collision. Charles Leclerc avoided a penalty because Oscar Piastri was judged not to be far enough alongside to claim the same right to racing room.

The distinction turned on the details of Formula 1’s driving guidelines. In Hamilton’s case, the stewards said Russell stayed within the space available and that Hamilton’s slide caused the contact, though the penalty was reduced to five seconds because Hamilton had tried to avoid the crash and the incident happened on lap one.

Leclerc’s contact with Piastri was more debatable, even though the official decision was no further action. The stewards found Piastri had only partial overlap and no realistic chance of completing the move from that position, while also deciding Leclerc had not intentionally forced him off track.

The decisions came on a dramatic Spa weekend in which Kimi Antonelli won from pole for Mercedes, Leclerc finished second and Max Verstappen took third. Antonelli now leads the drivers’ standings by 45 points, while Hamilton moved up to second after finishing fourth and Russell retired from the race.

Beyond the stewarding debate, Spa also raised bigger questions for F1: the race drew a reported record weekend crowd of 400,000, yet its current deal means it will not appear every year, with the Belgian Grand Prix absent from Spa in 2028 and 2030.

Sources & copyright

This article does not reproduce any source in full. It is built from public facts and editorial work; original links belong to their authors.

Public sources

This article may use AI for summarization, translation, or SEO assistance, and is reviewed by editors before publishing.

Discussion

    Related reading

    News
    BBC panel weighs Mercedes reliability after Antonelli Belgian GP win
    Editorial1 min
    News
    Verstappen-to-Mercedes talk remains analysis, not a confirmed F1 move
    Editorial1 min
    News
    Antonelli steadies title push with Belgian Grand Prix win
    Editorial1 min
    News
    Mercedes scout Gwen Lagrue reportedly set for Red Bull driver development role
    Editorial1 min
    Why Hamilton was penalised but Leclerc wasn't | ScoreGale